食管静脉曲张对原发性肝癌合并肝硬化根治性切除术预后的影响

Effects of esophageal varices on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic cirrhosis after radical resection

  • 摘要: 目的
    探讨食管静脉曲张(EV)对原发性肝癌合并肝硬化患者根治性切除术预后的影响。
    方法
    回顾性分析2001年1月至2010年12月青岛大学医学院附属医院收治的455例原发性肝癌合并肝硬化患者的临床资料和随访结果。61例患者术前影像学检查出现EV为EV组,394例无EV表现的为无EV组,比较两组患者的手术情况及预后。所有患者术后3个月内每月复查1次,以后每3个月复查1次,随访时间截至2012年12月或患者死亡。 计量资料或率的比较采用 χ 2 检验;KaplanMeier法绘制生存曲线,生存率的比较采用Logrank检验,多因素分析采用COX回归风险模型。
    结果
    患者均行根治性肝切除术,其中行肝切除+贲门周围血管离断术4例,脾切除术18例(包括联合贲门周围血管离断术3例)。EV组患者手术切缘距肿瘤距离<0.5 cm、脾切除、术中出血量≥1000 ml和术中输血患者比例显著多于无EV组,两组比较,差异有统计学意义( χ 2 =12.517,5.370,12.711,4.430,7.148,29.616,47.111,P <0.05)。多因素分析结果显示:肿瘤直径>5 cm和非孤立型肝癌是影响原发性肝癌合并肝硬化患者根治性切除术后的独立危险因素( RR=1.639,2.041,P <0.05)。
    结论
    伴有EV的原发性肝癌合并肝硬化患者根治性切除术的生存时间显著低于无EV的患者,但伴有EV不是影响原发性肝癌合并肝硬化患者根治性切除术后长期生存的独立危险因素。

     

    Abstract: Objective
    To investigate the effects of esophageal varices (EV) on the incidence of complications and prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic cirrhosis after radical resection.
    Methods
    The clinical data of 455 patients with HCC and hepatic cirrhosis who were admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2001 to December 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were divided into the EV group (61 patients) and non EV group (394 patients) according to the results of preoperative imaging examination. The intraoperative condition and the prognosis of the patients in the 2 groups were compared. All the patients were re examined every month within the first 3 months after operation, and then they were re examined every 3 months thereafter. The follow up was ended till December, 2012 or the day of patients′ death. Comparison of the measurement data and rates was done by chi square test; the survival curve was drawn by Kaplan Meier method, and the survival was analyzed using the Log rank test; multivariate analysis was done by Cox proportional hazard regression model.
    Results
    All the patients received radical hepatectomy. Four patients received hepatectomy+pericardial devascularization, 18 received hepatectomy+splenectomy (3 of them received pericardial devascularization). The ratios of patients with the distance between the resection margin and the tumor< 0.5 cm, splenectomy, volume of intraoperative blood loss≥1000 ml and intraoperative blood transfusion in the EV group were significantly greater than those in the non EV group ( χ 2-136.3 months). There were 218 patients died, including 37 patients in the EV group and 181 in the non EV group. The ratios of patients died of HCC, hepatic diseases or other reasons were 67.57%(25/37), 29.73%(11/37) and 2.70%(1/37) in the EV group, and 86.19% (156/181), 6.63%(12/181) and 7.18%(13/181) in the non EV group, with significant difference between the 2 groups ( χ 2 =12.517, 5.370, 12.711, 4.430, 7.148, 29.616, 47.111, P <0.05). The results of multivariate analysis showed that tumor diameter>5 cm and non solitary tumor were independent risk factors influencing the prognosis of patients with HCC and hepatic cirrhosis after radical resection ( RR=1.639, 2.041, P <0.05) .
    Conclusion
    The survival time of cirrhotic HCC patients with EV is significantly shorter than those without EV after radical resection, while EV was not the independent risk factor influencing the survival of cirrhotic HCC patients after radical resection.

     

/

返回文章
返回